Tag: Power Girl

Posted on

illregretthisname:

copperbadge:

peoriarhetoriapeoria:

copperbadge:

jupitersmaughart:

hopeless–geek:

“You’re keeping the outfit, right?”

My Captain America Stuff  | Redbubble | Commissions

I feel like @copperbadge should be tagged for this.

We can ONLY DREAM. 

I want to know what sort of stays are needed to keep that from flapping and how it won’t end up puncturing a lung. It’s beautiful and I want fiction exploring these and other questions.

I feel like maybe he has that “invisible” lycra on under it like figure-skaters are required to use to hold their bits of their costumes together. 

Or maybe some form of magnets. 

@bikiniarmorbattledamage because ey, male empowerment!

Okay, that is some FINE redesign of Nomad’s classic outfit into MCU costume style! @hopeless–geek has legit understanding of what were the most iconic parts of the original and translated them really well into how Marvel heroes dress in the films.

image

I mean, if Steve does abandon the name of Captain America in the movies, why wouldn’t he go for the empowerment of deep cleavage? 

Clearly, as a character no longer aligned with his previous iconography, he totally should go just for bare skin on his chest instead of a new emblem or a blank top. It so totally worked for DC as an explanation for Power Girl’s boob window, didn’t it? 

image

Yeah, right.

~Ozzie

As we all know, the deeper the neckline, the deeper the character. And this design is still canon!

image

I want to believe.

-Icy

Posted on

Hey, I was just looking at that rule 63 Power Girl, and it got me thinking. Why do people, when they make these types of rule 63, focus on the primary sexual characteristics, and not the secondary? If you were to make a rule 63 of the rule 63 Power Girl, you would need to give her a huge clitoris/vulva.

image

(source)

Whether something classifies as a primary or secondary characteristic is mostly only of interest to biologists and people involved in medicine.   The classification refers purely to biological matters and development during puberty.

If someone were to make a Rule 63 of the Rule 63 would look like Power Girl, because massive genitalia is not what society considers “sexy” in women – but massive boobs are.

What’s really interesting to me is the disregard for all the other aspects involved.  For example, Power Boy’s lips remain full and kissable but his upper body is more bulked than Power Girl – but not as ripped and chiseled as conventional super heroes are.

– wincenworks

more about false equivalence on BABD

Posted on

marchoftheaprils:

Hey, I was just looking at that rule 63 Power Girl, and it got me thinking. Why do people, when they make these types of rule 63, focus on the primary sexual characteristics, and not the secondary? If you were to make a rule 63 of the rule 63 Power Girl, you would need to give her a huge clitoris/vulva.

image

(source)

Whether something classifies as a primary or secondary characteristic is mostly only of interest to biologists and people involved in medicine.   The classification refers purely to biological matters and development during puberty.

If someone were to make a Rule 63 of the Rule 63 would look like Power Girl, because massive genitalia is not what society considers “sexy” in women – but massive boobs are.

What’s really interesting to me is the disregard for all the other aspects involved.  For example, Power Boy’s lips remain full and kissable but his upper body is more bulked than Power Girl – but not as ripped and chiseled as conventional super heroes are.

– wincenworks

more about false equivalence on BABD