lesbianantiiope:

mushroomhobbit:

You know how in those videogames when the girl character gets an “armor upgrade” and it’s actually super sexier??? I imagine Tony that way :))))
Tony actually wore this ironman suit in the 80s comics, NO JOKE

follow me on twitter // support my art, buy me a coffee! *u*

@bikiniarmorbattledamage check out this empowering iron man armour, which is apparently canon

We have to send a strongly-worded letter to Marvel about this blatant CENSORSHIP! How could they put Tony in that awful, protective full-body armor when he could be saving the world in a metal crop top?? Now, finally, he and Cap can match!

And with such soulful eyes, he will definitely lead the Avengers to victory!

-Icy

Angela, as seen in the Guardians of Galaxy cartoon

Amazingly, in transition from comic book to animation aimed at children, her bikini armor transforms into a skin-tight full body armor with a cleavage. Reminds me of that time Dagger’s catsuit somehow managed not to have a huge cross-shaped cutout on her boobs in the Ultimate Spider-Man show

I guess, in a way, superheroine costumes are kinda like pokemon who evolve only via trade (except pokemon are always awesome). They need a change of medium to be even a little bit less awful.

~Ozzie

illregretthisname:

copperbadge:

peoriarhetoriapeoria:

copperbadge:

jupitersmaughart:

hopeless–geek:

“You’re keeping the outfit, right?”

My Captain America Stuff  | Redbubble | Commissions

I feel like @copperbadge should be tagged for this.

We can ONLY DREAM. 

I want to know what sort of stays are needed to keep that from flapping and how it won’t end up puncturing a lung. It’s beautiful and I want fiction exploring these and other questions.

I feel like maybe he has that “invisible” lycra on under it like figure-skaters are required to use to hold their bits of their costumes together. 

Or maybe some form of magnets. 

@bikiniarmorbattledamage because ey, male empowerment!

Okay, that is some FINE redesign of Nomad’s classic outfit into MCU costume style! @hopeless–geek has legit understanding of what were the most iconic parts of the original and translated them really well into how Marvel heroes dress in the films.

image

I mean, if Steve does abandon the name of Captain America in the movies, why wouldn’t he go for the empowerment of deep cleavage

Clearly, as a character no longer aligned with his previous iconography, he totally should go just for bare skin on his chest instead of a new emblem or a blank top. It so totally worked for DC as an explanation for Power Girl’s boob window, didn’t it? 

image

Yeah, right.

~Ozzie

As we all know, the deeper the neckline, the deeper the character. And this design is still canon!

image

I want to believe.

-Icy

There’s been some excitement over Valkyrie’s full armor for Thor Ragnarok… but frankly I’m disappointed for the most part. 

Even Tessa’s Thompson’s badass attitude can’t fix the weirdness of this design. Top plate even has a literal hole between the breasts. It shows the layer of armor beneath instead of bare skin, but it’s still a weakening and blow-directing point on the chest. And even though relatively flat, the breastplate overall brings plenty of attention to the boobs with the shapes and colors (could it be any less subtle than painting the titties gold?).

I’m starting to think that the other, vacuum-sealed chest Valkyrie costume was some sort of “See? We can do worse!” decoy, so that the audience’s expectations are lowered enough to accept just a slightly less insulting boobplate as an improvement.

And that’s a shame, because with a better chest piece (and without the wedge heels) this could have been a cool, believable female warrior costume (even if more on the aesthetic than practical side). 

Seems to me like boob ornamentation always gets in the way of Valkyrie looking truly great, no matter which iteration of the character it is.

~Ozzie

Is it just me or does she look like she’s a party member in Mass Effect? I mean…

image

She does not look like she belongs at all… Is she maybe Space Valkyrie from the Future??

-Icy

h/t: @olofahere

more of Marvel’s Valkyrie on BABD

Tidy Up Tuesday #61

This week… 


Marvel representative decided to blame the rich representation of new characters, particularly women, LGBTQ+ folk and people of color, in their superhero comics as a reason for their recent sales drop. They’re making a bold claim that it’s the readers and retailers who didn’t really want diversity. 

A claim proven unsubstantiated by simply comparing sales numbers and business practices at Marvel in the last couple of months.


Incidentally, we discussed the potential of scapegoating the strive for diversity in media if said media is unsuccessful in our “Go make your own!” article


Things we addressed before:


~Ozzie & – wincenworks

batmanisagatewaydrug:

peachy-keen-glam-queen:

saved-by-the-notepad:

image
image
image

I mean…

@batmanisagatewaydrug

so not only is this Boob Armor appallingly ugly, but it’s extra inexplicable when you consider

they clearly goddamn know how to make lady armor without boobs, what the fuck happened?

Thanks to many readers who sent photos of the MCU Valkyrie in Thor: Ragnarok our way! 

Remembering that Lady Sif from the same franchise always presented as “Stupid Hollywood Bullshit, But Demonstrates That a Completely Armored Woman Can Still Be Sexy AF” and her armor veered on the smoother side of boobplate, it’s sad to see Valkyrie’s breastplate fully embrace the vacuum-sealed aesthetic. 

Is Valkyrie’s role in Marvel to always come in and bluntly remind us that female armor has to have hypervisible boobs

What a spectacular way to ruin an otherwise cool costume design and the introduction of Tessa Thompson, a woman of color, in a role of Norse-inspired character.

~Ozzie