Hyrule Warriors’ Twilight Princess DLC includes Link’s empowering outfit yet:
Postmen in Hyrule are pretty badass!
– wincenworks
Hyrule Warriors’ Twilight Princess DLC includes Link’s empowering outfit yet:
Postmen in Hyrule are pretty badass!
– wincenworks
female characters
can be
covered up
and objectified
female characters
can be
pantsless
and not
objectified
IT’S UP TO THE ARTISTS AND WRITERS
I dedicate this reblog to anyone who thinks that we object to women showing some skin by principle… No, we don’t. Just as we do not think covering everything up is a universal solution to the problem sexist costume designs.
The way a character is framed (visually and story-wise) makes a world of difference between just having a questionable costume and being outright objectified.
And as much as bikinis, bathing suits, cheerleader outfits etc. remain a silly wardrobe choice for an on-duty warrior/crimefighter, above here we have small sample of evidence that pants or full-body suits can actually look worse.
Let me refer back to @pointlessarguments101’s article that I quoted waaay back:
Putting a female hero in pants does not mean she is somehow protected from an artist positioning her primarily for the male gaze. For example, Marvel Comics recently began a new ongoing called Fearless Defenders which stars Valkyrie and Misty Knight. Both of these characters wear pants and, yet, I lost count by about page five of how many times Misty’s ass took center stage in any given panel. Basically, where there’s a male gaze will, there’s a male gaze way — pants or no pants, tights or bared legs.
Preach!
~Ozzie
more on costume design | more on character design | more about the iconic example: Starfire
female characters
can be
covered up
and objectified
female characters
can be
pantsless
and not
objectified
IT’S UP TO THE ARTISTS AND WRITERS
I dedicate this reblog to anyone who thinks that we object to women showing some skin by principle… No, we don’t. Just as we do not think covering everything up is a universal solution to the problem sexist costume designs.
The way a character is framed (visually and story-wise) makes a world of difference between just having a questionable costume and being outright objectified.
And as much as bikinis, bathing suits, cheerleader outfits etc. remain a silly wardrobe choice for an on-duty warrior/crimefighter, above here we have small sample of evidence that pants or full-body suits can actually look worse.
Let me refer back to @pointlessarguments101’s article that I quoted waaay back:
Putting a female hero in pants does not mean she is somehow protected from an artist positioning her primarily for the male gaze. For example, Marvel Comics recently began a new ongoing called Fearless Defenders which stars Valkyrie and Misty Knight. Both of these characters wear pants and, yet, I lost count by about page five of how many times Misty’s ass took center stage in any given panel. Basically, where there’s a male gaze will, there’s a male gaze way — pants or no pants, tights or bared legs.
Preach!
~Ozzie
more on costume design | more on character design | more about the iconic example: Starfire
Y’know I’m usually against “more adult”/“more realistic”/“grittier”/“edgier” remakes of kids shows/games… but this idea in this fan art actually looks like one that I could get behind.
– wincenworks